Packed Like Sardines? The Debate Over Migrant Worker Transport in Singapore

A Reddit post recently went viral after a user shared a photo of a lorry labeled "13 Pax"—with another sighting of a truck stating "21 Pax." The image, taken from r/SingaporeRaw, led to a heated discussion about the legality and ethics of transporting migrant workers in such conditions.

"They explained in parliament if use buses, companies will go bust." – Stanislas_Houston

The discussion quickly turned into a debate about cost-cutting measures in the construction industry, where businesses claim that providing proper transport for workers would be too expensive.

Public Reactions: Unsafe or Necessary Cost-Saving?

Many Redditors were quick to point out the obvious safety concerns. The lack of seatbelts and proper restraints means that, in the event of an accident, workers could be thrown off the vehicle. Others questioned why Singapore, a country known for its strict safety regulations, still allows this practice.

"If lorry suddenly ebrake, bodies will go flying..." – Maleficent_Today_934

"Money > human lives. Ez." – Laui_2000

Some users highlighted that change might only happen when a major accident occurs.

"The only time this stands a chance of changing is when, not if, a mass casualty situation happens." – Founders_Mem_90210

Others, however, took a more pragmatic approach, pointing out that many industries rely on these cost-saving methods to function.

"Lax change to aircon bus and increase construction costs only, when it happens I hope all of you continue to sing the same tune hahaha. Reality is everyone act outraged but nobody wanna foot the bill." – MeeKiaMaiHiam

Some even compared this to peak-hour MRT and bus rides.

"No different than MRT or bus during peak hours." – theprobeast

Why Are Lorries Still Used for Worker Transport?

Singapore has debated the safety of lorry transport for years, but the government has yet to impose a full ban. Some key reasons include:

• Cost concerns: Employers argue that providing buses would be too expensive, leading to higher project costs.
• Industry norms: Many workers come from countries where such transport is common, and they may not view it as unusual.
• Regulatory challenges: While there are rules in place for maximum passenger capacity, enforcement remains inconsistent.

Despite the arguments, safety remains a key concern. Construction workers contribute significantly to Singapore’s urban landscape, and many feel that their transport should reflect the same safety standards expected for any other commuter.

Should This Change?

The debate continues—should Singapore ban the transport of workers in lorries and enforce proper seating arrangements? Or is this a necessary reality to keep costs low and projects running?

For now, the practice remains legal, but with growing awareness and public concern, it remains to be seen if stricter regulations will eventually be introduced.